Condemnation to plagiarism
نویسنده
چکیده
One of the biggest spots of science communication is plagiarism. This despicable practice, although it is practiced by a small percentage of scientists has created many hitches and put under suspicion the serious studies of those engaged in science as a form of knowledge to improve the condition of life on our planet. Plagiarism was one of the dominant themes of the XXI Scientific Publishing Course of the Brazilian Association of Medical Editors (ABEC), held 15-17 May in São José dos Campos, SP, in which the Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (BJCVS) was represented by its Executive Editor, Ricardo Brandau. In his presentation, Marcelo Krokscz, Professor of Scientific Methodology at Fundação Escola de Comércio Álvares Penteado (FECAP) and experts in the field, drew a picture on ethics in science and consequences of plagiarism, as the growing number of articles portrayed. He showed a study published in 2011 in Nature, revealing that the number of retractions has risen 10 times in the previous decade, while in the same period the number of articles published has increased by only 44% in journals indexed in PubMed and Web of Science (http://www.nature.com/news/2011/111005/ full/478026a/box/2.html)[1]. Krokscz and other speakers emphasized the need for scientific publications to be vigilant in curbing the practice, which involves not only plagiarism, but also the self-plagiarism, an issue ignored by many. Among the suggestions are carefully reading of submitted manuscripts by the Editors and Reviewers, and explicit instructions in Guidelines for Authors and use of plagiarism detection software. BJCVS always vehemently repudiated plagiarism and already uses detection software (eTBLAST®) and will leave clear its position in Instructions to Authors. Also, the Journal will include in the submission process of manuscripts a letter that must be signed by the authors, warning of the risks and consequences of plagiarism and self-plagiarism. I ask the Editorial Board of BJCVS to remain vigilant in order to avoid that our journal suffers with this problem. Another point I wish to emphasize is the adoption of CrossRef by BJCVS. The CrossRef is an association of publishers that aims to make the most effective scientific communication. With just a click on a reference duly identified by the DOI in a publication, the researcher has access to the cited article. The citation network currently covers more than 67 million journal articles, in addition to book chapters, data, theses and technical reports[2]. This is a very valuable tool for authors and publishers, which will be paid with funds from the Brazilian Society of Cardiovascular Surgery. A major achievement implanted in our journal was to make it available as APP (application), both for iOS (iPhone, iPad) and Android system (Samsung, Motorola, Sony, and others). Thus, once downloaded the app, the reader can simply access it to find BJCVS articles. The application is available for download on the App Store for iOS, or GOOGLE PLAY for Android.
منابع مشابه
Causes, Patterns, and Economic Implications of Carcass Condemnation of Cattle Slaughtered at Oshana Region, North of Namibia Based on Post-Mortem Inspection
Background: Meat inspection is one of the essential tools for ensuring good quality and safe meat. The objective of this study was to evaluate carcass condemnation of cattle slaughtered in Oshana region, North of Namibia. Methods: In this 4-year retrospective study, causes, patterns, and economic implications of carcass condemnation of cattle slaughtered in Oshana region, North of Namibia were...
متن کاملAn introduction to the examples of scientific plagiarism and its identification soft-wares
Background: Increasing Immorality and Plagiarism in the country's higher education system has become a serious crisis. Hence, the purpose of this study was to analyze the Examples of Plagiarism and the introduction of Plagiarism detection software. Method: The present study is a narrative review study. Articles in Persian and Latin related to the use of scientific theft key words in databases w...
متن کاملPlagiarism and Intertextuality: RA Authors’ Sociocultural Perceptions and Mainstream Practices
This study reports on research article (RA) authors’ definitional understanding and sociocultural perceptions of intertextuality and plagiarism in academic writing. To meet this end, a questionnaire, consisting of three sections, was constructed and emailed to Iranian RA authors who have published in leading international and local applied linguistics journals. The findings of the first two sec...
متن کاملEnglish-Persian Plagiarism Detection based on a Semantic Approach
Plagiarism which is defined as “the wrongful appropriation of other writers’ or authors’ works and ideas without citing or informing them” poses a major challenge to knowledge spread publication. Plagiarism has been placed in four categories of direct, paraphrasing (rewriting), translation, and combinatory. This paper addresses translational plagiarism which is sometimes referred to as cross-li...
متن کاملA brief review of plagiarism in medical scientific research papers [RETRACTED]
[THIS ARTICLE IS RETRACTED] Plagiarism refers to “adopting someone else’s words, work or ideas and passing them off as one’s own”. It is potentially considered as the most prevalent form of scientific dishonesty discovered in research papers. The present review aims to provide a thorough account of plagiarism to build awareness about all dimensions of plagiarism.The key...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره 29 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2014